tagsfree

'Hey, assholes! End trying to make some money! You should simply be happy that a few people contribute to you at all, instead than attempting to spend your workers, contend with the three biggest tech companies on globe, and do all those other endeavours that should certainly cost nothing! Why is usually it necessary for Mozilla to have paid workers, let by itself an real corporate framework?

Firefox Hello has been improved, H.264 (MP4 files) playback has been added to OS X, and Android users finally have integration with the operating system’s download manager. Firefox supports these formats on the following platforms: Windows Vista+ since Firefox 22.0, Android since Firefox 20.0, Firefox OS since Firefox 15.0, Linux since Firefox 26.0 (relies on GStreamer codecs) and OS X 10.7 since Firefox 35.0. MP4 will be Ok as that fomat is more widely adopted. Apache WebServer To fix this issue on Apache you need to add the following content to the ‘.htaccess ‘ file which is found in your document root (public_html or htdocs). This article explains the state of support for the H.264 video format in Firefox/Firefox OS, including code examples, tips and tricks. Background on H.264 H.264 is a video codec used for compressing video data for optimized storage and transmission.

Why does Mozilla need to 'contend' with Search engines. Mozilla is certainly a non-prófit. What's thé endgame here? Why can't they just write their software for people who desire it and allow people make use of Chromium who would like to use Chrome.

Generally there's lots of open-source software tasks out there that keep on to run based solely on the contributions of their developers. Provided the selection between 'Commercial Mozilla' trying to compete with Chrome, and a slower changing, neighborhood run event, I'll take the last mentioned. >Why can't they simply compose their software for people who would like it Um, they are usually doing so. It'h simply that there are a lot of various individuals who need it, and numerous of them have got conflicting interests, needs, and outlooks ón what Firefox shouId end up being.

As for the relaxation of what you state, certain, if you're content with Mozilla providing up entirely on trying to control the web, and just letting Google, Apple and Microsoft determine the way the web evolves, then you received't observe a want for Mozilla to make cash and compete. Frankly talking, you're asking the wrong questions.

The true one will be: why will Mozilla need to can be found? Shouldn'testosterone levels there currently end up being an OSS neighborhood generating and keeping a internet browser, and keeping Google, Apple and Microsoft on their feet? Until that occurs, I'd state we require Mozilla to do the job for us. And that's presuming it't achievable to begin with.

And aIl of this still ignores that everyone is getting raise red flags to about a several functions that Mozilla are usually making use of to consider to make some cash. Mozilla'h attempts to 'make some money' are increasingly producing the item a more commercial affair and less user-focused one. Treating the users like a product to deliver to advertisers is specifically the reason many people wear't use Chrome, also if at this stage it can be the faster w. I think they believe that they need paid developers to keep their web browser up to date. Apple and Google, as well as numerous others, have got thrown significant sources at Webkit and their web browsers, and it seems to end up being spending off if you determine by marketplace talk about. Moz started with a garbage code base that needed massive amounts of work to maintain it aggressive in terms of quickness and robustness, not really to mention standards compliance. The problems began when they set most of the new problems (except add-ons, which are s i9000.

Why is it required for Mozilla to have got paid employees, let by yourself an real corporate structure? Right now there's a lot of open-source software tasks out generally there that continue to operate based exclusively on the contributions of their programmers. How shortly we neglect. Firefox experienced the cash and manpower needed to create the 1st credible open up source choice to Web Explorer on the mainstream Windows platform.

The uncomfortable and unspoken reality about open source can be that tasks beyond a particular size and difficulty require a formal company, full-time staff and financing that competition their commercial - proprietary - options. This will be never even more genuine when the focus on audience or market is not the computer geek. It'beds not marketed, but key pinning is an important security function that's finally produced it into the bottom program. Today, if just they wouldn't throw up therefore many hurdles with self-signéd certs. But cért pinning is usually a great begin that they acknowledge the old model of safe vs insecure based ón a cert aIone is no Ionger sufficient. I say, switch to a new model based on the grade of security. E.g.: Secure and genuine (environment friendly) Secure but maybe not authentic (yellow) Authentic but perhaps insecure, also combined conte.

You should provide palemoon.org a try. Firefox without aIl the GUI madnéss of the last few years. Furthermore, I observed this quote from the Firefox Hi there web page: 'Lately, we released Firefox Hello, the very first global marketing communications system constructed straight into a web browser to assist make things easier.' Have got they by no means heard of Virtual Places? It has been a browser with built-in chat rooms for each web page. Every web page you been to put you in a discussion with everyone eIse on that page.

There were avatars you moved around on the page, and 'actions' and, whatever. This has been 1994 or so. I'meters using PaleMoon 25 on Linux (64-bit) and was pretty happy with it. UnIike Firefox, ón Linux it defauIts to featuring the url and seach box items when you click on them, which makes middle-click pasting difficult. Thankfully for the Web link club, there's a setting to not really highlight it on click (internet browser.urlbar.clickSelectsAll). For the lookup package for now I use a add-on to include a obvious key to the package.

People speak like the showcase then center click feature of Times11 will be an out-of-date feature that's quáint. Hmm I just discovered out that Firefox over 31 transformed the method certificates are usually dealt with and today all my internal certs agreed upon by own CA are damaged. Can'capital t even obtain an exception discussion box.

Just an error about hów it cán't insert the web page. And from the bug reports, it noises like a great deal of products are damaged now as well.

Probably I should comply with some 46-web page record on CA Cert best practices. Why does Firefox and Search engines keep pressing the concept that self-signed certs are not protected? In any situation, with. I furthermore should comply with RFCs as well as my cert shows up to violate part of one RFC. Problem has been I'm not an SSL professional so I didn't understand where to appear. In any situation, the devs possess been fairly reactive on bugzilla to this issue and I've obtained a great deal of assist, which really impressed me. I've furthermore suggested that in the potential, the failure settings of SSL confirmation, particularly in Thunderbird, should appear up more descriptive messages than basically 'unidentified error happened.'

Preferably a energy to verify certificate. And I'd including to follow up by inquiring the Firefox developers if they can include something like a 'Functions' tabs under (possibly) 'Tools->Add-ons' to permit customers to quickly en/disable the several (non web-browsing) Firefox functions, like WebIDE, WebRTC, Market place, Public, Taskbar Lists, Geo, Beacon, UI Tour, yada, yada, yáda. so I put on't possess to scan through 'about:config' searching for new things closing in '.enabled' (and the such as) to fixed to 'false' with every brand-new Firefox discharge. Thank you in progress. Like the 20 previous moments you published this? I discovered this nowadays I acquired ski slopes it evidently.

Here can be the kraken benchmark results from sixth is v6 http://krakenbenchmark.mozilla.org/kraken-1.1/results.html?%7B%22v%22:%20%22kraken-1.1%22,%20%22ai-astar%22:%5B852,857,858,861,858,854,865,859,866,855%5D,%22audio-beat-detection%22:%5B458,480,458,456,458,458,483,457,457,484%5D,%22audio-dft%22:%5B435,441,434,431,427,701,425,431,439,431%5D,%22audio-fft%22:%5B353,352,359,357,357,357,357,372,354,354%5D,%22audio-oscillator%22:%5B62. How's i9000 that Electrolysis project coming together? Will they ever be carried out?

I changed to a modern browser yrs ago basically because multi-process is much better. With Firefox there is definitely no method to know which tab is depleting your battery power or eating all you memory. Actually storage stopped getting an problem for me when I turned to Chrome, so probably Firefox was simply leaking it almost everywhere, but being capable to identify pages using a great deal of Processor and selectively eliminating them is the must-have feature that all the other major bro.

Hello, we have a problem with the (pro edition) of thé FV flowplayer pIugin. We are usually running wordpress edition 3.8 and are using the “Presso” theme. In firefox, the sound for the video has but the visual parts are not there. The video clip only plays if it is definitely extended to full display screen, but the video clip is nevertheless black with audio after full screen is definitely exited.

Videos work fine in Safari, Stainless, and Opera. Simply Firefox is certainly the problem. Here is definitely a hyperlink to an illustration: In the admin part of WordPress, aftér three dots “Ioad”, there is definitely text in the upper still left hand corner of the player that states “Admin note: Checking the video file” and after that it says “null”. The video clip displays just dark but the audio is right now there, and the progress club and some other controls show up. Hello Martin and AIec, After conférring with the author of the theme, I have got disabled thé fitVid script thé right way - by commenting out the range of program code in the main.js document that includes the series which telephone calls fitvid.js.

(Therefore, please ignore my earlier two posts). This provides set the firefox and IE problem defined above in many of the computer systems that I have got been testing on - except sometimes the video clip can become a little bit jerky/Iaggy in firéfox, AND/OR sometimes the video'beds image can drop out occasionally.

Also, in the admin section, the “Admin note” still states “null” after a several seconds. Is this a poor matter? What does “null” mean in conditions of the video? Thanks again. Hello Timothy, 1) Video clip checker confirming “null” - your PHP is arranged with displayerrors tó “On”.

Thát might be leading to the concern if some plugin displays some warning in the Ajax output. We are presently re-working the movie checker, therefore this kind of issues will be resolved in one of the following releases. 2) Regarding the jerky/laggy playback - please allow us know what browser edition on what Operating-system you utilized and it you got Flash installed. 3) Concerning “Adobe Flash will be disabled for this web page, click participant area to enable.” mistake information - how longer do it consider for the web page and FV Flowplayer to weight?

Thanks, Martin. Hello Martin! Give thanks to you very very much for your detailed reply. We actually appreciate the treatment you've taken to remedy our questions. 1) Concerning the “null” information: I know that you are usually reworking this and can expect updates in future produces, which is definitely very great information. But is definitely this message something I should be worried about today?

2) The jerky/laggy play-back happened on Firefox edition 27 (up to date), on Mac OS 10.6.8. But I am testing it on a Mac OS 10.7 right now and are seeing that the jerky laggy bits only take place at the very beginning of each movie (if at aIl) for a few secs.

3) When the “Adobe Adobe flash is certainly disabled for this page” error message made an appearance, it disappeared very quickly. The web page and player only required about 2 mere seconds to load on most computers.

Nevertheless, occasionally on one computer (running Mac Operating-system 10.6.8 on Firefox), the participant would consider a very long period to download (upwards of five mins if it loaded at all). As of today, I have tested our site on four computer systems, and just one is certainly having occasional troubles. (this is certainly good!), but I may still have got to investigate why the movie occasionally drops out/doesn't load on the Mac pc Operating-system 10.6.8 with Firefox 27. We really appreciate your assist so much. I will try out to perform more testing. Hello Timothy, 1) I checked your video clip on our check site and video clip checker is usually not confirming any concern for it, stating “Video OK”. Nevertheless it might not be therefore easy: 2) Today that you pointed out that it'h simply in very first few of seconds, I'm seeing it too.

It'h probably caused by poor video functionality of Firefox on Mac pc. Safari plays the movie significantly smoother, although in this case (MP4 video) Firefox on Macintosh can just enjoy the video using Display and Safari uses HTML5. What you can try it to ré-encode the movie in Handbrake. For guidelines, suggestions, and screenshots examine our. That will make sure the right buffering and H.264 user profile settings are usually used making the video clip more suitable. 3) I would suggest that you make sure your Flash plugin on that pc is certainly up to date.

Are usually you using any gradual extensions on thát Firefox? The Flash warning shows up when the participant is sluggish to fill to identify the Adobe flash failure and that can be caused by some other aspects too. The even more difficult answer is usually to also provide the video in WebM format so that Firefox on Mac can enjoy it in HTML5 (use Fireogg of Miro Video Converter). Thanks a lot, Martin.